Skip to content
Home
Members’ Area
P6 Submission Package Requirements
Report Review Services
Research & Technical Studies
Professional Development Library
How to Videos
PD Webinars
PD Workshops
Members’ Update
Links of Interest
Guidelines
Discipline
Membership
Performance Assessment
Practice
Submission Screening
Other CSAP Documents
Secure Online Fee Payment
Stakeholders
Frequently Asked Questions
About Us
News
PD Workshops
Board of Directors
Scholarships
Complaints & Discipline
About Contaminated Sites
Frequently Asked Questions
Events
Upcoming Events
Lunch and Learn
AGM & PD Workshop
Fall PD Workshop
Associated Events
Join
Membership Guidelines
Examination Fee Payment
Examination Statistics
Experience Review
Contact Us
Home
Members’ Area
P6 Submission Package Requirements
Report Review Services
Research & Technical Studies
Professional Development Library
How to Videos
PD Webinars
PD Workshops
Members’ Update
Links of Interest
Guidelines
Discipline
Membership
Performance Assessment
Practice
Submission Screening
Other CSAP Documents
Secure Online Fee Payment
Stakeholders
Frequently Asked Questions
About Us
News
PD Workshops
Board of Directors
Scholarships
Complaints & Discipline
About Contaminated Sites
Frequently Asked Questions
Events
Upcoming Events
Lunch and Learn
AGM & PD Workshop
Fall PD Workshop
Associated Events
Join
Membership Guidelines
Examination Fee Payment
Examination Statistics
Experience Review
Contact Us
Advancing land remediation and economic growth
Performance Assessment Feedback: Panel Members
Nelly Pomareda
2016-06-15T14:17:57-07:00
PA Feedback: PA panel members
Panel Member Feedback Form
Performance Assessment Number:
*
How well did the DM perform their role:
1. Was the PA process explained sufficiently?
*
yes
no
2. Was the DM available for questions?
*
yes
no
3. Were issues adjudicated in a fair and timely manner?
*
yes
no
4. Was there adequate communication with other panel member(s)?
*
yes
no
5. Was there adequate communication by the Delegated Member (DM)?
*
yes
no
6. Was the CSAP Coordinator available to answer questions (if necessary)?
*
yes
no
7. Did you feel constrained by the timeline for the PA?
*
yes
no
8. Did you feel constrained by the suggested level of effort?
*
yes
no
9. If you have taken part in a PA before did you find the process:
*
better this time
worse this time
about the same?
10. Do you have any suggestions for improvement? Please provide details.
NOTE: Respondent's name will be kept confidential by the PA Coordinator. Responses will be reviewed by the PAC in order to benchmark the process and aid in further refinements.